Was having a look at the matrix sequels again and while they have improved somewhat compared to my original assesment of them they’re still not great.
But could they ever have been?
Probably not. So in that case you have two real options when you do sequels – either try a direct continuation of the story or go for something similar but different and I think your better off with the second option.
No, I’m not being stupid.
What I mean by this are sequels which keep the bulk of the same charachters but change the focus and/or the style.
The two best example’s that come to mind are Bryan Talbot’s ‘Luther Arkwright’ and Rob Zombie’s ‘House of a 1000 Corpses/Devil’s Rejects’.
While I’m realy not sure how many of you will be aware of ‘Luther Arkwright’ I’ll start with that. The first book ‘The adventures of Luther Arkwright’ is a black and white, heavy line art science-fiction comic focused on the charachter of Luther. The second book ‘Heart of Empire’ is in colour, has a more traditionally ‘comic book’ style and focuses on the children and former lover of Luther instead with Luther himself only gradually coming into the series.
‘House of a 1000 Corpses’ is a grindhouse horror, with it’s main charachters being a group of teens, with little action (guns, fights etc.) and a focus on gore. ‘The Devil’s Rejects’ is more of a road-trip movie, focuses on the villians of the first film, has a fair bit of action (several shootout’s) and goes more for psychological horror than gore (though there still is gore – even so it’s a different type of gore)
What both of these things have in common is that you don’t realy need to have seen the first book/film to get the second one (though it helps) and they don’t realy keep the style consistent across the series. And yet in both cases the sequels work precisely because of that fact.
Which has me wondering.
Would the matrix sequels have worked better with their main focus being on Trinity and Morpheous rather than Neo? Prehaps pushing Neo into that subway station for the bulk of the two films? I mean a messiah isn’t realy that relateable to. And should they have had more of the type of fights with swords and blades etc. just to keep it from being too similar to the first one with all its gunfights?
But in general, with sequels (excluding series/franchises) are you not better off making something that’s quite different from it’s predecessor(s)?